Skip to content
Politics

Italian Education Minister Demands Withdrawal of History Textbook Over Political Content

Giuseppe Valditara faces pushback from publisher Laterza after labeling a school textbook as biased and unsuitable for students.

By 3 min read

Italian Minister of Education and Merit Giuseppe Valditara has called for the withdrawal of a high school history textbook, arguing that the volume contains biased and unreliable information regarding the current government. The book, titled 'Trame del tempo 3' and published by the prominent Italian firm Laterza, has become the center of a heated national debate concerning the intersection of political influence and academic freedom in the classroom.

The controversy centers on specific passages in the textbook that describe the administration of Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni. The authors characterize the government as one that implements 'clearly liberticidal' measures and suggest that the ruling party maintains a strong connection to a 'declaredly fascist' base. Furthermore, the text notes that the current government took power nearly a century after the March on Rome and 77 years after the liberation from fascism, while also accusing the administration of waging a war against migrants through deportation plans.

Minister Valditara, speaking during a visit to a middle school in Milan, stated that the textbook is scientifically inadequate and risks being used for the indoctrination of students. He argued that it is in the interest of the publisher to protect its scientific reputation by removing the text. 'I believe it is in the publisher's own interest, to safeguard the scientific reputation of its publishing house, to withdraw a text that is completely inadequate from a scientific point of view and that risks being functional to the indoctrination of students,' Valditara asserted.

The minister further emphasized that while he does not intend to censor the book, he believes it is his duty to speak out against content he considers historically false and politically oriented. He noted that unlike some other European nations, Italy does not have a government-led evaluation system for the scientific rigor of school textbooks, relying instead on the responsibility of educators and publishers. However, he maintained that a minister should be free to express criticism when a text presents subjective political narratives as historical fact.

Alessandro Laterza, the CEO of the publishing house, has firmly rejected the minister's request to pull the book from circulation. He framed the dispute as a fundamental issue regarding whether a government official has the authority to intervene in the adoption or content of educational materials. 'The issue is not the book, it is not the page of the book, but it is a matter of principle, namely: can the competent minister intervene to ask to modify or not adopt a textbook? My answer is no, regardless of this or that book, of this or that content,' Laterza stated.

The publisher also pointed out that the decision to adopt specific textbooks rests with teachers and school boards, not the government. Laterza suggested that if any party believes the content is defamatory, the appropriate venue for resolution is the judicial system, not political pressure. The publisher emphasized that the book is intended for high school students who are capable of critical thinking and forming their own opinions.

The situation has drawn reactions from across the political spectrum in Italy. Members of the Fratelli d'Italia party have supported the minister, with some calling the text a piece of propaganda that falsifies history. Conversely, opposition figures and labor unions have criticized the minister's stance, describing his request as an unprecedented and dangerous attempt at state censorship. As of now, the textbook remains available for use in schools, leaving the debate over the limits of political oversight in education unresolved.

Sources

Related stories