Skip to content
Entertainment

British Comedian David Walliams Accused of Sexual Misconduct and Grooming

A joint media investigation revealed multiple allegations against the children's author and television personality following a failed High Court injunction bid.

By 3 min read

British children's author and comedian David Walliams has been publicly identified as the celebrity behind a failed legal bid to block a joint journalistic investigation by The Guardian and ITV News. Published on Tuesday, the wide-ranging report details allegations from multiple women who claim Walliams used his fame, status, and influence to groom them and pursue them for sexual purposes when they were teenagers or young women.

The investigation relies on interviews with more than 100 people, including 30 sources with firsthand accounts, alongside emails, contemporaneous notes, and social media messages spanning back to 2003. Several women alleged that Walliams initiated contact when they were 15 years old. One woman detailed an alleged sexual assault at his home, while others described inappropriate encounters, unwanted sexual persistence, and workplace harassment involving junior employees and publishing staff.

Walliams, 55, has strongly denied all allegations of wrongdoing and criminal behavior. In a letter addressed to the investigative journalists, he stated that he is not a sexual predator and has not broken the law, though he acknowledged that he sometimes behaved thoughtlessly in past casual relationships. "Whilst a power imbalance is inevitable when one party is famous, abusing that power is something else entirely and it is something that I never did," Walliams wrote.

The publication of the allegations followed a high-profile legal battle in the High Court. Walliams sought an injunction to prevent the media outlets from identifying him, with his lawyers arguing that the publication of the misconduct claims would severely endanger his mental health. During the proceedings, his legal team disclosed that Walliams had made attempts on his life after receiving inquiries from the news organizations and was subsequently admitted to a psychiatric hospital for medical care.

Justice Matthew Nicklin ultimately dismissed the injunction request, ruling that halting publication would represent an exceptionally serious interference with freedom of expression. While acknowledging Walliams's longstanding psychiatric vulnerabilities and the increased risk of suicide, the judge determined that the evidence did not establish that outcome as inevitable and ruled that the investigation addressed matters of substantial public interest.

The fallout from the allegations has severely impacted Walliams's career and professional standing. Publisher HarperCollins severed ties with the bestselling author last year over behavioral concerns, and his extensive back catalogue was dropped. Additionally, production companies and festival organizers have distanced themselves from the entertainer, with reports indicating he has been removed from upcoming projects.

The revelations have sparked intense public discussion across the United Kingdom regarding the balance between the privacy rights of public figures and the press's responsibility to report on allegations of abuse of power. Legal representatives for Walliams maintain that his interactions were consensual and that he is devastated by the distress expressed by individuals he met years ago.

Sources

Related stories