Skip to content
Politics

Argentine Government Distances Itself from Superclásico Arbitration Controversy

Officials seek to contain political fallout following heated reactions to the match between Boca Juniors and River Plate.

By 3 min read

The Argentine government is attempting to distance itself from the intense public debate surrounding the recent Superclásico match, in which Boca Juniors defeated River Plate 1-0. The game, held at the Bombonera, was marked by controversial officiating decisions, including the expulsion of two River Plate players and several disputed calls involving the Video Assistant Referee (VAR).

While the match sparked widespread criticism from football figures and political leaders, the Casa Rosada has signaled a desire to avoid direct involvement in the dispute. Sources within the government indicated that they hope President Javier Milei will not comment on the matter, emphasizing that the administration intends to keep sports-related conflicts separate from its broader political agenda.

The controversy intensified after Minister of Economy Luis Caputo, a known River Plate supporter, posted comments on social media comparing the current state of football to the political landscape prior to President Milei’s administration. Although Caputo initially drew parallels between the two, he later clarified that his remarks were intended as a defense of the government's policies rather than a commentary on the match itself. Government sources stated that Caputo’s original post was an expression of his personal fandom and does not represent the official stance of the administration.

The match's officiating, led by referee Nicolás Ramírez and VAR official Silvio Trucco, drew sharp criticism from River Plate leadership. Former club presidents Jorge Brito and Rodolfo D'Onofrio publicly denounced the refereeing, with D'Onofrio labeling the officials as 'thieves' and calling the situation 'a disgrace.' In response to the backlash, the Argentine Football Association (AFA) released audio recordings from the VAR booth to justify the decisions made during the game.

Despite the government's attempt to remain neutral, other political figures have weighed in on the controversy. Former Cabinet Chief Guillermo Francos, who also supports River Plate, took a more aggressive stance, criticizing AFA leadership and specifically targeting Claudio 'Chiqui' Tapia. During a radio interview, Francos described the AFA as an institution in decline and reiterated President Milei's long-standing commitment to challenging what he characterizes as the 'mafia' operating within the organization.

The administration faces a delicate balancing act as it navigates these tensions. While the government remains in a state of friction with the AFA over various institutional issues, it relies on key interlocutors to manage the relationship. Chief of Cabinet Diego Santilli, who has long-standing ties to the football establishment, serves as the primary link between the government and the AFA. Officials are reportedly concerned that further public commentary on the match could complicate the government's legislative agenda and create unnecessary diplomatic or political friction.

Sources

Related stories